Appendix
1 : Lessons for the Church
I
believe we should thank Richard for the wake-up call that he's given
to the church. He probably doesn't realise it and it certainly wasn't
his goal, but I believe that is what it is! This is a page for Christians.
Here are some of the obvious things which I believe arise out of this
book.
A.
Defensive Christianity?
Working
through The God Delusion has reminded me that we have no
need to feel defensive. If you will take the trouble to check this
book out, page by page as I have, you will realise that:
a)
Richard is skating around on incredibly thin ice and is really proclaiming
the poverty of atheism, and
b)
as we think about the Christian answers, we realise we have very
firm ground beneath our feet.
We
have no need to act or speak defensively. We are the ones with the
answers that aren't just wild speculation; they are well founded and
can stand careful scrutiny! Defensiveness is so often a sign of a
weak faith. If we can face up to some of the challenges that come
with this book, then we may find ourselves with a stronger faith and
feel more confident and thus can become more graceful.
"I am not ashamed of the gospel, because it is the power of
God for the salvation of everyone who believes"
(Rom 1:16)
B.
Knowledgeable Christians?
A
number of times Richard berates Christians who don't know their Bibles
or what they are supposed to believe. This is a good challenge! In
the West at least, we live in a day of unprecedented affluence and
affluence tends to make us lazy. I'm not expecting all Christians
to go to Bible School, but it would be good if a lot more Christians
really did read and study their Bible on a regular basis.
In
the back half of Chapter 3 and a large part of Chapter 7, Richard
lambastes the Bible. The test for whether you know your Bible well
is, when you read those chapters, do you get frustrated by Richard's
total misunderstanding in the light of your knowledge of the Bible.
If you don't, it suggests that you have a lot of studying to do!
If
The God Delusion shakes you, it means two things:
1.
You haven't really thought through exactly what is being said and
have not noted the incredible amount of speculation and assumptions
that are there, and have not distinguished between scientific fact
and theoretical, philosophic wonderings.
2.
You don't know the basics of your Faith and of the Bible, and have
not realised that virtually all of what is said in this book about
the Bible, is bad misrepresentation.
"I
keep asking that the God of our Lord Jesus Christ, the glorious
Father, may give you the Spirit of wisdom and revelation, so that
you may know him better. I pray also that the eyes of your heart
may be enlightened in order that you may know the hope to which
he has called you, the riches of his glorious inheritance in the
saints"
(Eph 1:17,18)
C.
People of Integrity?
I
would like to link integrity here with the ability to think. It seems
to me that there are a lot of people in the church, especially in
America who take a stand on a particular issue or a particular teaching
but when you are discussing it, it becomes clear that they have based
their stand on sound bites, and have really not thought through the
issues from a Biblical Christian point of view. I apologise to my
American colleagues about my comments about the States but that is
how it so often comes over – but perhaps it's because it is such a
big country and makes more noise than we placid Brits. For a much
bigger explanation as to the 'American phenomenon', please read chapters
6 to 11 of Nancy Pearcey's book, Total Truth,
which seeks to explain something of the characteristics and history
of the church in the USA.
In
recent years, I have challenged those I know in America,
to think honestly. I challenged the premise that The Passion of
Christ or The Lion, the Witch and the Wardrobe would
bring revival. I have challenged the fear of Harry Potter,
which comes largely in those who have never opened one of the books.
But it's not solely on that side of the Atlantic.
On that issue, a colleague in this country suggested to me, following
the sell-out of the seventh Harry Potter book, that a pact had been
made with the devil to get the sales. As I pondered this evangelical
assessment, I was put in mind of Jesus' responses when his enemies
said he was of the devil. Having recently finished reading the last
book, I wonder if Satan is behind books that extol friendships, heroism,
courage, valour, truth, loyalty, goodness and the downfall of evil?
While
on the matter of integrity, I have commented within the notes that
because of the nature of the church, again (sorry) in America
especially, there are times
when the rest of us cringe with embarrassment at the antics of Christian
individuals, quite often on TV. Some of the stuff said from pulpits
and from TV studios does not stand up to scrutiny. Our problem so
often is that the people in question sometimes have ‘big ministries'
(a description that does not conform to Scriptural pattern) and because
most of what they say is good, when they speak off the rails we tolerate
it. There needs to be some form of accountability, but for the life
of me I don't know how we can bring it about.
Still
on the matter of integrity, how long will the Roman Catholic church
hang on to its add-on beliefs that are tantamount to pure superstition.
A number of times Richard derides these things and it simply leaves
the rest of us thoroughly embarrassed, regretfully having to say,
“Well, yes, you have a point.” Am I in faith that this part of the
church will exclude all historical add-on bits and only go with what
is clearly seen in the Bible? Sadly, no.
"It
gave me great joy to have some brothers come and tell about your
faithfulness to the truth and how you continue to walk in the truth"
(3 John 1:3).
D.
A People of Grace?
The
history of the church in the past century seems to be littered with
examples of voices of people of God who are speaking with far less
than the grace of God. I remember Francis Schaeffer writing about
the nature of schism in the early half of the last century. He pointed
out that disagreement should not be accompanied by hostility. Some
of the quotes that Richard uses of those who have disagreed with the
world's views, leave me almost weeping. Yes, we may say, he is picking
out extremist individuals, but they do still come in the name of the
Christian Church.
As
strongly as we may disagree with the ways of the world, and the behaviour
of the rest of the world, if we are abusive we are no different from
them. It is as simple as that. We will not make our point any stronger
by being abusive. God is the judge of all men, not you and me. Tragically,
the way some people have disagreed with the world, has meant that
many people have actually been turned away from the Gospel. When we
can show that we love this world while avidly disagreeing with them,
then we may find people taking more notice of us. I am convinced that
many people are turned off by the antics of the church, but if they
saw something of the love, grace and acceptance of Christ in us, I
am also convinced that many more people would turn, listen, consider
and come to see the Truth.
"The
wisdom that comes from heaven is first of all pure; then peace-loving,
considerate, submissive, full of mercy and good fruit, impartial
and sincere."
(James 3:17)
E.
An Imperfect People
Richard
sometimes takes us to task quite unfairly, simply because he does
not understand the nature of people and the nature of Christian people.
In the paragraph above on Integrity, I have raised a number of issues
where we fall short of the glory of God.
I
have been forced by Richard's writing to consider this whole subject
at length, for when I look around the world there are so many weird
and wonderful things that go on in the name of the Christian Church
that, at times, it almost makes me want to give up. Yet the truth
is that this side of heaven the church comprises imperfect redeemed
sinners. We get it wrong, all of us. We wish we didn't, but we do.
Expecting the Church to be perfect in all it says and does is unrealistic,
yet that is what we should be constantly aiming for.
This
awareness of our own imperfection should produce humility within us.
When we are told that divorce rates in some parts of the church are
as bad as in the world, we know we've got a lot of work to do. When
we find our teenagers behaving the same as those in the world, we
know we have a lot of work to do. When we find Christian business
men using the same questionable ethics as the world uses, we know
we have a lot of work to do. When we find large numbers confessing
to looking at Internet pornography, we know we have a lot of work
to do. We could carry on endlessly.
However,
at the end of all this, the truth is, as I've commented a number of
times in the notes, merely because human beings very often make a
mess of their (Christian) lives, that does not annul the Gospel; it
simply confirms the need of it.
"I
write this to you so that you will not sin. But if anybody does
sin, we have one who speaks to the Father in our defense--Jesus
Christ, the Righteous One."
(1 John 2:1)
And
So?
These
are just some of the more obvious things that I believe come as challenges
to us who are Christians, things we need to face and to deal with.
No doubt as I reread the book and the notes on these pages, I may
find more and add to them. For the time being, I simply ask that if
you are a Christian reading these pages, you give some reasonable
thought to these things. God speaks to His Church in a variety of
ways. Perhaps Richard is one of them. In my Introductory Page I apologise
if I have communicated ungraciously. If I have done so here, I reiterate
that apology.