|  | A 
        Short Response to Atheistic Claims about Christianity  My 
        wife, a religious studies teacher, asked me to write a short essay for 
        her to use in her lessons. Having done that, it crossed my mind that here 
        was an opportunity to create an interesting resource so here, below, you 
        will find, the ‘Exam Question' she gave me, my ‘Essay Answer' and then 
        a series of ‘Short Answer responses' to each of the points raised in the 
        ‘essay'. I emphasise they are short answers and each one could be expanded 
        greatly to clarify the points being made. Further information is available 
        elsewhere on this site and there are numerous books by distinguished and 
        world renowned Christian scholars which, sadly, appear so often to be 
        ignored by those atheists who wish to denigrate without having first given 
        deep and extensive thought to the subject matter here.      The 
        Exam Question: “There 
        are many valid reasons which support the view of atheists”. Examine and 
        comment on this claim.      My 
        ‘Essay':  Our 
        starting point must be to ask, what is the view of an atheist? A dictionary 
        definition of an atheist is one who denies the existence of God. A ‘valid' 
        reason (for holding any view) might be considered to be a reason that 
        naturally flows out of the nature of the subject under scrutiny. In reality, 
        therefore, reasons for rejecting the concept of ‘God' flow out of ideas 
        about such a ‘God'. We assume for the sake of this essay that our ‘God-concept' 
        is the Judaeo-Christian, supreme, divine being found in the pages of the 
        Bible.  The 
        first set  of reasons come from atheists' reaction to 
        this particular picture of God. Christians (and other believers) say God 
        is spirit and spirit cannot be seen. The atheist may say, existence is 
        only matter and there is nothing beyond that.  Believers 
        say God is an all-powerful, benign and loving being with personality. 
        Atheists tend to have a fourfold response to this. First, in this century 
        Richard Dawkins ( The God Delusion ) and Christopher Hitchens 
        ( God is not Great ) have been proponents of the view that says 
        that the Bible reveals a thoroughly unpleasant God and reject ‘him' on 
        those grounds.  Second, 
        they will add that the whole problem of suffering in the world indicates 
        a God who is either powerless or indifferent and not the God of love and 
        goodness put forward by believers.  Third, 
        they will say that they are masters of their own destiny and do not need 
        the crutch of religion which is what such a God provides (i.e. they do 
        not like being told there is someone to whom they would be answerable). 
         Fourth, 
        they will say that God or religious phenomena cannot be duplicated or 
        cannot be tested scientifically, i.e. you cannot get God to react. It 
        was W. K. Clifford in 1879 who said, “ It 
        is wrong always, everywhere, and for anyone to believe anything upon insufficient 
        evidence.” The claim of the atheist is that that evidence is lacking. 
         But 
        we must move on to a second set  of ‘valid reasons' that 
        are more sociological, psychological or philosophical. In this group we 
        find, a) World religion cannot agree on ‘a God', b) so much religious 
        belief is based on superstitious fear, c) so often religion seems to be 
        inherited – “I believe cos my parents do”, d) religion causes more division 
        and wars than it provides answers, e) religious belief is tantamount to 
        magic or weird mysticism f) Christian behaviour is so often lacking that 
        it invalidates the religion, g) religious language is unverifiable and 
        therefore meaningless. ( A. J. Ayer said, “ to 
        say that "God Exists" is to make a metaphysical utterance which 
        cannot be either true or false.)  The 
        final group  of ‘valid reasons' might come under the 
        heading, ‘God is redundant'. The primary claim made by modern atheists 
        is that science increasingly provides answers for things attributed to 
        God.  Richard Dawkins, (The Blind Watchmaker) said, 
        “ Darwin made it possible to be an intellectually fulfilled atheist”, 
        placing all his trust in the theory of evolution. Humanists (mostly atheists) 
        put forward the assumption that mankind has come of age and so materially 
        (within science, technology and medicine) and psychologically, we no longer 
        need to rely on some mysterious figure in the shadows of Neanderthal consciousness. 
           Before 
        we finish it is wise to check whether these reasons put forward by prominent 
        atheists are in fact ‘valid'. That they may so appear at first glance, 
        there is no doubt for they have been run out countless times in different 
        ages. Christian philosopher, Dr. Francis Schaeffer in his extensive apologetic 
        work of last century, maintained that we all approach these things with 
        presuppositions already formed, mostly in reaction to childhood events. 
        It is an interesting exercise to listen to the best known atheists talk 
        about their childhood and see the origins of the things against which 
        they now speak. ‘Valid' thus, so often, becomes “what fits my world-view”. 
         The 
        challenge from both sides is to make the effort to think more widely about 
        all the issues above. As a large number of apologists, reacting against 
        Dawkins' The God Delusion , pointed out, his Biblical knowledge 
        that he uses in his arguments is the equivalent of the Child's Spotters 
        Book of Birds that a theologian might use to critique Dawkin's extensive 
        and excellent work in the sphere of biology. We need to be both genuinely 
        informed, open to all possibilities, and willing to really think through 
        issues in the light of that knowledge.  Short 
        Answer responses:       
         
          | Atheists' 
              Reasons  | Short 
              Answer Responses  |   
          | The 
              first set  of reasons come from atheists' reaction 
              to this particular picture of God. Christians (and other believers) 
              say God is spirit and spirit cannot be seen. The atheist may say, 
              existence is only matter and there is nothing beyond that.    
               | It 
              is a short-sighted science that fails to ask, what is ‘material'? 
              Is energy ‘material'? Is gravity ‘material' My own definition for 
              God in these discussions is “energy with personality”. Yes, it still 
              defies understanding but Quantum theory defies understanding yet 
              we accept the assertions of very bright physicists.  |   
          | Believers 
              say God is an all-powerful, benign and loving being with personality. 
              Atheists … have been proponents of the view that says that the Bible 
              reveals a thoroughly unpleasant God and reject ‘him' on those grounds. 
                 
               | The 
              sadness of these arguments that have been put forward by twenty 
              first century atheists is the obvious ignorance of what the Bible 
              does actually say about God and why it says it. Part of the work 
              of theology is to reason out what we find in Scripture and the person 
              who takes the time to thoroughly read the Old Testament (as well 
              as the New)will find the God revealed there is exactly the same 
              as that in the New, a God described in the New as love nd full of 
              goodness.  |   
          | Second, 
              they will add that the whole problem of suffering in the world indicates 
              a God who is either powerless or indifferent and not the God of 
              love and goodness put forward by believers.    
               | God 
              is neither powerless nor indifferent but has granted mankind free 
              will, which enables humans to choose to follow or reject Him, and 
              choose whether to be loving and good or self-centredly unpleasant. 
              ‘Man's inhumanity to man' is the primary cause of so much suffering. 
              The fact that the earth works in a broken form since the Fall of 
              Genesis 3, is also a primary cause of suffering.  |   
          | Third, 
              they will say that they are masters of their own destiny and do 
              not need the crutch of religion which is what such a God provides 
              (i.e. they do not like being told there is someone to whom they 
              would be answerable).    
               | Theory 
              and practice are very different. Listen to the great philosopher 
              and hear his fine words about the greatness of Man, but then look 
              at the quality of his life, the way he treated his family and even 
              abused himself with drink or drugs and so often the lie is revealed. 
              The Bible uses the word Sin and essentially it means self-centred 
              godlessness leading to poor behaviour. We are all tainted with it 
              at modern scandals and so much modern life reveals in abundance. 
              We all need help.  |   
          | Fourth, 
              they will say that God or religious phenomena cannot be duplicated 
              or cannot be tested scientifically, i.e. you cannot get God to react. 
              It was W. K. Clifford in 1879 who said, “ It 
              is wrong always, everywhere, and for anyone to believe anything 
              upon insufficient evidence.” The claim of the atheist is that that 
              evidence is lacking.    
               | If 
              God is an almighty divine Being as the Bible declares, then He will 
              not be at our beck and call. The fact is that the Bible is FULL 
              of His words and His actions (which appear with a remarkably uniformity 
              throughout the sixty six books of the Bible with so many different 
              writers) which can be checked and assessed. Rather than lacking 
              the evidence is there in abundance. In addition we might speak of 
              Christian experience which can be observed and it is a foolish person 
              who on examining so many Christian lives decries the goodness and 
              the experience observed there.    
               |   
          | But 
              we must move on to a second set  of ‘valid reasons' 
              that are more sociological, psychological or philosophical. In this 
              group we find, a) World religion cannot agree on ‘a God',    
               | The 
              existence of a number of ‘world religions' first of all simply highlights 
              the fact that the vast majority of mankind seek after a divine being 
              and spiritual experience. Judaism and Christianity portray the same 
              God of the Bible but Christianity stands out with its unique claims 
              based on reliable historical background.  |   
          | b) 
              so much religious belief is based on superstitious fear,    
               | Isn't 
              so much human life built upon superstitious fear? The ‘gods' of 
              history reveal a superstitious fear. Christianity comes from a God 
              of love who banishes all fear in the light of His love. Christians 
              are probably some of the least superstitious people on the earth, 
              because they do not fear weird powers but trust in a loving God. 
                 
               |   
          | c) 
              so often religion seems to be inherited – “I believe cos my parents 
              do”,    
               | Heaven 
              forbid! I'm sure this is true sometimes which only goes to highlight 
              the need to clarify that a real Christian is only one who has had 
              an experience of God through Jesus Christ, a real and personal encounter, 
              not a second hand belief.    
               |   
          | d) 
              religion causes more division and wars than it provides answers, 
                 
               | Actually, 
              no, politics using the name of religious groups does. Even the famous 
              Crusades modern historians will tell you, were not so much religious 
              exercises as simply defensive operations to counter the ever-expanding 
              invasions of Muslim armies into Europe . The Christian faith preaches 
              peace and will always look for reconciliation but recognises the 
              need on occasion to defend against invasion.    
               |   
          | e) 
              religious belief is tantamount to magic or weird mysticism    
               | Christian 
              belief is grounded in carefully documented very down to earth history 
              that is reliable. There is nothing fairy-tale or weird about it 
              and there is nothing weird about the average everyday Christian! 
                 
               |   
          | f) 
              Christian behaviour is so often lacking that it invalidates the 
              religion,    
               | Without 
              doubt human behaviour has so often failed its Lord and history is 
              cluttered with such failures. This only goes to highlight that Christians 
              are ordinary people who can still get it wrong, even though they 
              know and experience the wonder of God, His love and His resources. 
                 
               |   
          | g) 
              religious language is unverifiable and therefore meaningless. ( 
              A. J. Ayer said, “ to say that "God 
              Exists" is to make a metaphysical utterance which cannot be 
              either true or false.)    
               | We 
              constantly use language that cannot be verified absolutely, e.g. 
              “I love you” (what does that really mean with its shades of understanding?) 
              “That sky is very beautiful” When we say “God exists we are saying 
              no more (to use one approach) than to say “Plato existed” or “Gravity 
              exists). One of those was based on historical evidence (for which 
              there is staggeringly more for the Bible) and the other on experience 
              (and Christians will say that repeatable religious experience similarly 
              points to one cause – God).  |   
          | The 
              final group  of ‘valid reasons' might come under 
              the heading, ‘God is redundant'. The primary claim made by modern 
              atheists is that science increasingly provides answers for things 
              attributed to God.  Richard Dawkins, (The Blind 
              Watchmaker) said, “ Darwin made it possible to be an intellectually 
              fulfilled atheist”, placing all his trust in the theory of evolution. 
                 
               | I 
              don't really mind whether you believe in the theory of evolution 
              with all its question marks or the theory of Creation with all its 
              question marks. I am open to possibilities where there is an absence 
              of certainty. Sadly some atheists speak where there is an absence 
              of certainty as if it is certain. In so doing they upset a lot pf 
              other atheists who point out that such dogmatism is arrogant and 
              gets them a bad name collectively. That also ignores those other 
              very clever scientists who have a strong Christian faith. Be careful 
              with your dogmatism; it can make you look foolish.    
               |   
          | Humanists 
              (mostly atheists) put forward the assumption that mankind has come 
              of age and so materially (within science, technology and medicine) 
              and psychologically, we no longer need to rely on some mysterious 
              figure in the shadows of Neanderthal consciousness.    
               | I 
              actually believe that God desires us as human being to grow up! 
              That doesn't mean that we ignore Him but it does mean we stop being 
              self-centred and making claims that are patently foolish. That the 
              human race has come of age is patently untrue. We live in a world 
              where upset, stress, and anxiety are rife, (and so our health services 
              and social services are stretched to breaking point) whether it 
              be in family life, local life, national life, private life or corporate 
              life. To deny this is to reveal we live with closed eyes and closed 
              minds. If anything, the state of the world today says we need not 
              religious extremism, nor more political ideology, nor more education, 
              but an intelligent faith in the wonderful loving God of the Bible. 
               |    
         |