|
A
Short Response to Atheistic Claims about Christianity
My
wife, a religious studies teacher, asked me to write a short essay for
her to use in her lessons. Having done that, it crossed my mind that here
was an opportunity to create an interesting resource so here, below, you
will find, the ‘Exam Question' she gave me, my ‘Essay Answer' and then
a series of ‘Short Answer responses' to each of the points raised in the
‘essay'. I emphasise they are short answers and each one could be expanded
greatly to clarify the points being made. Further information is available
elsewhere on this site and there are numerous books by distinguished and
world renowned Christian scholars which, sadly, appear so often to be
ignored by those atheists who wish to denigrate without having first given
deep and extensive thought to the subject matter here.
The
Exam Question: “There
are many valid reasons which support the view of atheists”. Examine and
comment on this claim.
My
‘Essay':
Our
starting point must be to ask, what is the view of an atheist? A dictionary
definition of an atheist is one who denies the existence of God. A ‘valid'
reason (for holding any view) might be considered to be a reason that
naturally flows out of the nature of the subject under scrutiny. In reality,
therefore, reasons for rejecting the concept of ‘God' flow out of ideas
about such a ‘God'. We assume for the sake of this essay that our ‘God-concept'
is the Judaeo-Christian, supreme, divine being found in the pages of the
Bible.
The
first set of reasons come from atheists' reaction to
this particular picture of God. Christians (and other believers) say God
is spirit and spirit cannot be seen. The atheist may say, existence is
only matter and there is nothing beyond that.
Believers
say God is an all-powerful, benign and loving being with personality.
Atheists tend to have a fourfold response to this. First, in this century
Richard Dawkins ( The God Delusion ) and Christopher Hitchens
( God is not Great ) have been proponents of the view that says
that the Bible reveals a thoroughly unpleasant God and reject ‘him' on
those grounds.
Second,
they will add that the whole problem of suffering in the world indicates
a God who is either powerless or indifferent and not the God of love and
goodness put forward by believers.
Third,
they will say that they are masters of their own destiny and do not need
the crutch of religion which is what such a God provides (i.e. they do
not like being told there is someone to whom they would be answerable).
Fourth,
they will say that God or religious phenomena cannot be duplicated or
cannot be tested scientifically, i.e. you cannot get God to react. It
was W. K. Clifford in 1879 who said, “ It
is wrong always, everywhere, and for anyone to believe anything upon insufficient
evidence.” The claim of the atheist is that that evidence is lacking.
But
we must move on to a second set of ‘valid reasons' that
are more sociological, psychological or philosophical. In this group we
find, a) World religion cannot agree on ‘a God', b) so much religious
belief is based on superstitious fear, c) so often religion seems to be
inherited – “I believe cos my parents do”, d) religion causes more division
and wars than it provides answers, e) religious belief is tantamount to
magic or weird mysticism f) Christian behaviour is so often lacking that
it invalidates the religion, g) religious language is unverifiable and
therefore meaningless. ( A. J. Ayer said, “ to
say that "God Exists" is to make a metaphysical utterance which
cannot be either true or false.)
The
final group of ‘valid reasons' might come under the
heading, ‘God is redundant'. The primary claim made by modern atheists
is that science increasingly provides answers for things attributed to
God. Richard Dawkins, (The Blind Watchmaker) said,
“ Darwin made it possible to be an intellectually fulfilled atheist”,
placing all his trust in the theory of evolution. Humanists (mostly atheists)
put forward the assumption that mankind has come of age and so materially
(within science, technology and medicine) and psychologically, we no longer
need to rely on some mysterious figure in the shadows of Neanderthal consciousness.
Before
we finish it is wise to check whether these reasons put forward by prominent
atheists are in fact ‘valid'. That they may so appear at first glance,
there is no doubt for they have been run out countless times in different
ages. Christian philosopher, Dr. Francis Schaeffer in his extensive apologetic
work of last century, maintained that we all approach these things with
presuppositions already formed, mostly in reaction to childhood events.
It is an interesting exercise to listen to the best known atheists talk
about their childhood and see the origins of the things against which
they now speak. ‘Valid' thus, so often, becomes “what fits my world-view”.
The
challenge from both sides is to make the effort to think more widely about
all the issues above. As a large number of apologists, reacting against
Dawkins' The God Delusion , pointed out, his Biblical knowledge
that he uses in his arguments is the equivalent of the Child's Spotters
Book of Birds that a theologian might use to critique Dawkin's extensive
and excellent work in the sphere of biology. We need to be both genuinely
informed, open to all possibilities, and willing to really think through
issues in the light of that knowledge.
Short
Answer responses:
Atheists'
Reasons |
Short
Answer Responses |
The
first set of reasons come from atheists' reaction
to this particular picture of God. Christians (and other believers)
say God is spirit and spirit cannot be seen. The atheist may say,
existence is only matter and there is nothing beyond that.
|
It
is a short-sighted science that fails to ask, what is ‘material'?
Is energy ‘material'? Is gravity ‘material' My own definition for
God in these discussions is “energy with personality”. Yes, it still
defies understanding but Quantum theory defies understanding yet
we accept the assertions of very bright physicists.
|
Believers
say God is an all-powerful, benign and loving being with personality.
Atheists … have been proponents of the view that says that the Bible
reveals a thoroughly unpleasant God and reject ‘him' on those grounds.
|
The
sadness of these arguments that have been put forward by twenty
first century atheists is the obvious ignorance of what the Bible
does actually say about God and why it says it. Part of the work
of theology is to reason out what we find in Scripture and the person
who takes the time to thoroughly read the Old Testament (as well
as the New)will find the God revealed there is exactly the same
as that in the New, a God described in the New as love nd full of
goodness.
|
Second,
they will add that the whole problem of suffering in the world indicates
a God who is either powerless or indifferent and not the God of
love and goodness put forward by believers.
|
God
is neither powerless nor indifferent but has granted mankind free
will, which enables humans to choose to follow or reject Him, and
choose whether to be loving and good or self-centredly unpleasant.
‘Man's inhumanity to man' is the primary cause of so much suffering.
The fact that the earth works in a broken form since the Fall of
Genesis 3, is also a primary cause of suffering.
|
Third,
they will say that they are masters of their own destiny and do
not need the crutch of religion which is what such a God provides
(i.e. they do not like being told there is someone to whom they
would be answerable).
|
Theory
and practice are very different. Listen to the great philosopher
and hear his fine words about the greatness of Man, but then look
at the quality of his life, the way he treated his family and even
abused himself with drink or drugs and so often the lie is revealed.
The Bible uses the word Sin and essentially it means self-centred
godlessness leading to poor behaviour. We are all tainted with it
at modern scandals and so much modern life reveals in abundance.
We all need help.
|
Fourth,
they will say that God or religious phenomena cannot be duplicated
or cannot be tested scientifically, i.e. you cannot get God to react.
It was W. K. Clifford in 1879 who said, “ It
is wrong always, everywhere, and for anyone to believe anything
upon insufficient evidence.” The claim of the atheist is that that
evidence is lacking.
|
If
God is an almighty divine Being as the Bible declares, then He will
not be at our beck and call. The fact is that the Bible is FULL
of His words and His actions (which appear with a remarkably uniformity
throughout the sixty six books of the Bible with so many different
writers) which can be checked and assessed. Rather than lacking
the evidence is there in abundance. In addition we might speak of
Christian experience which can be observed and it is a foolish person
who on examining so many Christian lives decries the goodness and
the experience observed there.
|
But
we must move on to a second set of ‘valid reasons'
that are more sociological, psychological or philosophical. In this
group we find, a) World religion cannot agree on ‘a God',
|
The
existence of a number of ‘world religions' first of all simply highlights
the fact that the vast majority of mankind seek after a divine being
and spiritual experience. Judaism and Christianity portray the same
God of the Bible but Christianity stands out with its unique claims
based on reliable historical background.
|
b)
so much religious belief is based on superstitious fear,
|
Isn't
so much human life built upon superstitious fear? The ‘gods' of
history reveal a superstitious fear. Christianity comes from a God
of love who banishes all fear in the light of His love. Christians
are probably some of the least superstitious people on the earth,
because they do not fear weird powers but trust in a loving God.
|
c)
so often religion seems to be inherited – “I believe cos my parents
do”,
|
Heaven
forbid! I'm sure this is true sometimes which only goes to highlight
the need to clarify that a real Christian is only one who has had
an experience of God through Jesus Christ, a real and personal encounter,
not a second hand belief.
|
d)
religion causes more division and wars than it provides answers,
|
Actually,
no, politics using the name of religious groups does. Even the famous
Crusades modern historians will tell you, were not so much religious
exercises as simply defensive operations to counter the ever-expanding
invasions of Muslim armies into Europe . The Christian faith preaches
peace and will always look for reconciliation but recognises the
need on occasion to defend against invasion.
|
e)
religious belief is tantamount to magic or weird mysticism
|
Christian
belief is grounded in carefully documented very down to earth history
that is reliable. There is nothing fairy-tale or weird about it
and there is nothing weird about the average everyday Christian!
|
f)
Christian behaviour is so often lacking that it invalidates the
religion,
|
Without
doubt human behaviour has so often failed its Lord and history is
cluttered with such failures. This only goes to highlight that Christians
are ordinary people who can still get it wrong, even though they
know and experience the wonder of God, His love and His resources.
|
g)
religious language is unverifiable and therefore meaningless. (
A. J. Ayer said, “ to say that "God
Exists" is to make a metaphysical utterance which cannot be
either true or false.)
|
We
constantly use language that cannot be verified absolutely, e.g.
“I love you” (what does that really mean with its shades of understanding?)
“That sky is very beautiful” When we say “God exists we are saying
no more (to use one approach) than to say “Plato existed” or “Gravity
exists). One of those was based on historical evidence (for which
there is staggeringly more for the Bible) and the other on experience
(and Christians will say that repeatable religious experience similarly
points to one cause – God).
|
The
final group of ‘valid reasons' might come under
the heading, ‘God is redundant'. The primary claim made by modern
atheists is that science increasingly provides answers for things
attributed to God. Richard Dawkins, (The Blind
Watchmaker) said, “ Darwin made it possible to be an intellectually
fulfilled atheist”, placing all his trust in the theory of evolution.
|
I
don't really mind whether you believe in the theory of evolution
with all its question marks or the theory of Creation with all its
question marks. I am open to possibilities where there is an absence
of certainty. Sadly some atheists speak where there is an absence
of certainty as if it is certain. In so doing they upset a lot pf
other atheists who point out that such dogmatism is arrogant and
gets them a bad name collectively. That also ignores those other
very clever scientists who have a strong Christian faith. Be careful
with your dogmatism; it can make you look foolish.
|
Humanists
(mostly atheists) put forward the assumption that mankind has come
of age and so materially (within science, technology and medicine)
and psychologically, we no longer need to rely on some mysterious
figure in the shadows of Neanderthal consciousness.
|
I
actually believe that God desires us as human being to grow up!
That doesn't mean that we ignore Him but it does mean we stop being
self-centred and making claims that are patently foolish. That the
human race has come of age is patently untrue. We live in a world
where upset, stress, and anxiety are rife, (and so our health services
and social services are stretched to breaking point) whether it
be in family life, local life, national life, private life or corporate
life. To deny this is to reveal we live with closed eyes and closed
minds. If anything, the state of the world today says we need not
religious extremism, nor more political ideology, nor more education,
but an intelligent faith in the wonderful loving God of the Bible.
|
|